Class D mono vs. A-B dual channel bridged for sub?
What kind of quality difference would be noticed when running a sub on either a class d mono amp or a dual channel class a-b amp with the channels bridged? I’ve noticed that class d’s are more expensive, is this because they are more power efficient or do they also produce better quality signals for subs?
a-b are cheaper? not uh. i dont think so. a-b amps arnt very efficient and are made for sound quality for component sets or home audio (you want even more expensive/sq/less efficient check out vacuum tube amps) d class amps are made for subs because there very efficient like 70-80% and the more quality the brand usually the less of a strain on your electrical it is
id like to know what a-b amps are cheaper then d class tho!
hope it helps
class d amps are way more power efficient and are specifically designed for subs. a-b amps suck way more juice and just arent designed for subs as well as class d amps
References :
a-b are cheaper? not uh. i dont think so. a-b amps arnt very efficient and are made for sound quality for component sets or home audio (you want even more expensive/sq/less efficient check out vacuum tube amps) d class amps are made for subs because there very efficient like 70-80% and the more quality the brand usually the less of a strain on your electrical it is
id like to know what a-b amps are cheaper then d class tho!
hope it helps
References :
v
Ok yeah their more efficent an generally produce more power, their cheaper an are easier to set up, running 2 Amps can be a little tricky for beginers but d is better for subs
References :
I know alit about car audio